h4831sc - An Overview

Your session is going to timeout as a result of inactivity. Click Okay to increase your time and effort for yet another 0 minutes.

I've applied H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There are not many cartridges that I utilize it for as I look normally to gravitate to other powders. Nevertheless, I can not declare that it does not work. It is just that Various other powders do the job much better for any presented cartridge. As an example, from the 280, H4831 gave me good velocity and really fine groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. Having said that, RL19 was marginally better in accuracy, though the velocity was practically identical.

Can they be interchanged without problems other then making use of typical load tactics when switching from whole lot to lot?

We’d like to ensure that you’re 18 years of age or more mature right before allowing you to buy our web page. Are you presently 18 many years of age or more mature?

My expertise would be that the SC and SSC loaded to precisely the same bodyweight given that the prolonged cut demonstrates a lowered velocity.

I have used H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without big difference. The one thing would be the short Slice provides you with a bit more space. Very good luck!gun)

If there is no load data it is actually mainly because this powder is just not ideal for this cartridge. Usually one will never come across a single powder to suit all cartridges, along with the loved ones of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) you are inquiring about isn't going to function.

and you might like to spend money on some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does alter through the years. 4831 powder of yrs ago is not very same as what on earth is now available. that's why someone seriously interested in reloading safely and securely should have essentially the most recent load data textbooks to check with.

I've observed the exact opposite to generally be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.

Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded h4831 vs h4831sc powder is the exact copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain sizing, for that reason, the designation SC or short Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to flow from the powder measures extra easily, assisting to alleviate the consistent cutting of granules.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're entirely unique powders, with IMR 4831 remaining significantly faster compared to Hodgdon variants. Will not take care of them as the exact same powder, since they most unquestionably are not.

I h4831sc load data use fifty two grs H4831sc which has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It's accurate, moderate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I might start out at fifty two gr and perform up.

A lot of the previous Lyman data just listed IMR 4831, which was surplus military services h4831sc load data powder and now newer mfg as H4831.

The container didn't provide the "Excessive" emblem on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, And that i wound up with One more pound of H4831SC, this a single With all the "Severe" logo on it.